My initial thoughts on Learner-centered teaching are that it can empower the students. My experiences tell me that they are clearly put out (i.e., bothered) by not having any control over what happens in a class. Obviously we cannot completely abandon this as the students do not understand accreditation and what absolutely needs to be covered. However, we can incorporate their ideas into some parts of the course like attendance policies, late work, textbooks, due dates of some assignments, testing styles, etc. I was really interested in the story of the instructor who lets a student committee pick the textbook from a group of books that he pre-selected. However, I think some caution is needed when implementing Learner-centered teaching strategies. One pitfall is that the students may try to make things too easy if they do not respect the instructor or the instructor allows this to happen. Therefore, I think this will only work when the instructor has a strong personality and does not allow the students to exert too much control. I also wonder if the students, after their initial hesitation, might argue for even greater control. As the text instructs, “Power is redistributed in amounts proportional to students’ ability to handle it.” If it is handled in this manner then I only see an upside.
The most interesting part of Lang’s chapter was the discussion of the many hardships and struggles that students have that we cannot really understand because our course is but a small part of their lives. The most useful part of this discussion was the idea to “stick compassionately to your standards.” In the end we may not really know why they are missing class or turning in late assignments. It may be for legitimate reasons or for reasons such as being out too late at a party. Having guidelines that all students adhere to will allow you to treat everyone in the class equally. This may be something that can be discussed and agreed upon by the students in a Learner-centered approach to teaching. A past discussion also mentioned allowing students to drop a quiz or test, or allow a certain number of absences without penalty. I don’t know if this completely solves the problem because students may have more ”issues”, real or perceived, that come up above and beyond what you initially allowed them to miss without penalty. How do you plan to handle all of the excuses that you will hear from students? Will you require proof of what they were doing?